Monday, August 15, 2011

Fair Use – When Is It Fair?

Fair Use is the concept that sometimes copyrighted material – such as a song created by a songwriter – can be used without permission or payment.  Fair use is a limitation or exception to the exclusive rights given to the creator of an artistic work by copyright law.  But Fair Use is limited to narrow categories: news reporting, research, teaching, scholarship, commentary, criticism. 
There are four elements to determine whether use of copyrighted material is a Fair Use:  the purpose and character of the use; the nature of the copied work; and amount of the work copied; and the effect of the copying on the copyrighted work’s value.  Generally, the greater the amount of the copyrighted work used, the less likely there is a fair use.  And if the use reduces the copyrighted work’s value, the less likely there is a fair use.
            Using a sample of music is probably never Fair Use.  Using a copyrighted work for a non-commercial reason is not necessarily fair use.  Using a copyrighted work for a commercial reason – to make money – is probably not a fair use.  But parody, even for profit, can be a fair use.  In the Supreme Court case Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., Roy Orbison's music publisher, Acuff-Rose Music Inc., sued 2 Live Crew for their use of "Oh, Pretty Woman."  The Supreme Court said 2 Live Crew’s version with altered lyrics was a ridiculing commentary. Because the parody was the product, rather than used for advertising, commercial sale did not bar the Fair Use.
            But remember, while Fair Use is a defense against copyright infringement, it does not stop anyone from suing to get a court’s opinion on whether a use is Fair Use.  Fair Use is a very technical aspect of copyright law and should not be taken lightly.  It is always best to get permission, or pay the proper royalty, before using any copyrighted material – and of course, get proper legal counsel.

2 comments:

  1. Craig - what legal issues do the growing population of 'mash-up DJs' face?

    I heard that the artists that hold the original copyright must enforce the rights associated with it, so these DJs would be taking a measured risk of exposing themselves to litigation?

    Are the mitigating steps needed to avoid litigation under Fair Use, such as permission or royalty payments, affordable to up and coming artists?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Nathan - shoot me an email and I'll give you a few thoughts.
      C

      Delete